so.

so.

i've been sick, and busy, and hence i haven't been blogging and/or venturing out of my house. but i feel much better now, and my suitcase is fully packed [sadly, only with the bare minimum of jackets, towels and books so i'm just going to have to venture to york without any clothing, toiletries and electrical appliances whatsoever.] so i'm back here to blog!

unfortunately, i have nothing to blog about.

i missed the alumni welcome tea. BAH. i missed saturday's church service when clement led worship. BAH. i missed one driving lesson. BAH.

what a wonderful way to spend my third-last week in singapore.

anyway, if you've read my little post entitled "who's afraid of the big, bad happy ending?" [yes, the one advocating 'trashy', 'lurid' novels], i've recently found this author who wrote a newsletter regarding the anti-romantic bias! yes! love-starved voyeurs of the world unite! if you're interested, you can find it here: http://www.jennycrusie.com/essays/defeatingthecritics.php

i personally think it's fantastic.

there was another article which i read that was so stunningly funny and amazingly sarcastic that i forgot who actually wrote it. but there was a line in it that went like this, "romance is for uneducated, sexually repressed voyeurs. yes. just as crime novels are for repressed murderers and psychopaths with a taste for necrophilia."

in my humble opinion, we uneducated, sexually repressed voyeurs are bloody brilliant creatures.

ciao.